ICYMI: Ex-DSS Director Explains Why 2012 Anti-Subsidy Protests Remained Peaceful Under Jonathan

Mike Ejiofor, former Director of the Department of State Services (DSS) and current President of the Alumni Association of the National Institute for Security Studies, has explained why the 2012 protest against former President Goodluck Jonathan’s proposed removal of the petrol subsidy did not turn violent. Ejiofor attributed the peaceful nature of the protest partly to the former President’s accommodating stance and the relatively better economic conditions at the time.

In a recent interview on Arise TV Morning Show, Ejiofor discussed the upcoming #EndBadGovernance protests scheduled for August 1-10, and the government’s efforts to deter the organizers. The DSS has warned that there are plans by some individuals to exploit the protest for causing chaos and violence. Additionally, the military and police have expressed concerns about the potential for violence during the protests.

Ejiofor noted that the 2012 protest remained non-violent due in part to Jonathan’s lenient attitude and the less dire economic conditions. He expressed concern that the current climate of hunger and desperation could lead to the protest being hijacked by individuals with ulterior motives.

He emphasized that while the right to protest is constitutionally protected, there are significant risks involved, particularly with the current high level of economic hardship. Ejiofor cautioned that the protest could be exploited by those seeking to push their own agendas, potentially leading to violence.

Recalling the #EndSars 2020 protests, which resulted in property damage and significant losses, Ejiofor reiterated his concerns that similar unrest could occur with the upcoming protests. He advised the organizers to reconsider their plans, allowing the government more time to address their grievances.

Ejiofor also responded to the security warnings, affirming that while protests are a right, they should not descend into violence. He cautioned against inflammatory statements from some of President Bola Tinubu’s aides, which could exacerbate tensions and provoke further unrest.